umalogonarrow.jpg - 14.66 K

Return to Home Page                                                                        Web Hosting donated by Xmission

Xmission is UMA's preferred internet provider



Utah Mining Association Newsletter

March 2008 Edition
Newsletter Sponsored By

Joy Mining Machinery

Visit Joy Mining Machinery -- Click here

 

 


EVENTS

Return to Top of Page

 

Utah Mining Association's Ninth Annual
2008 Education Golf Tournament
June 10, 2008 at Riverbend Golf Course
Click here for Registration form


Mark your Calendars:
UMA's 93rd Annual Convention
August 14 and 15, 2008
Canyons Resort, Grand Summit Hotel
Park City, Utah

 

DMITRICH: 40 YEARS IS ENOUGH
(Source: Cathy McKitrick, Salt Lake Tribune, 03/07/2008

Utah Senate Minority Leader Mike Dmitrich, 71, has decided not to seek re-election this fall. Although sad to leave, the Price Democrat says that 40 years of lawmaking is enough.

With the exception of former Davis County lawmaker Haven Barlow, Dmitrich holds the record for longest stint in the state Legislature.

Dmitrich announced his retirement plans on KOAL radio Thursday morning - a medium he's used to regularly converse with his constituents for years.

"It's a tough decision," Dmitrich said. "I've made a lot of friends up there and enjoyed it, but I think new blood is really important."

Also announcing his retirement at session's end was Sen. Bill Hickman, R-St. George.

In 1968, then-31-year-old Dmitrich won a seat in the House of Representatives, where he remained until appointed to the Senate in 1991.

A year later, voters weighed in to keep him in the seat. Following the 2001 redistricting, the sprawling District 27, which Dmitich represents, grew to include spans all of Carbon, Emery, Grand and San Juan counties and also includes Utah County's Mapleton and Spanish Fork. Self-described as a Cal Rampton Democrat - "I stood up for the working person" - Dmitrich is lauded for his lack of pretense by his colleagues, regardless of political stripe.

"He's genuine. He's straight shooting," said Senate Majority Leader Curtis Bramble, R-Provo. "Mike would find ways to reach across political philosophies to find common ground."

Shortly after this year's legislative session ended at midnight Wednesday, Dmitrich said he mentioned to Bramble that it would be his last.

Rep. Brad King, D-Price - befriended and mentored by Dmitrich - said he will run for his seat this November.

"During my first visit to the Legislature in junior high, Mike was there. All my conscious life he's been my representative or senator," King said. "It's with a great deal of reluctance that I have to say goodbye to him in that capacity."

During his pre-Legislature days, Dmitrich distinguished himself playing high school and college football, and then went to work mining coal, where he gained a firsthand understanding of the work environment that killed his father and grandfather.

"It's a terrible loss for us as an institution," College of Eastern Utah President Ryan Thomas said of Dmitrich's retirement.

Thomas became emotional as he spoke of Dmitrich's devotion to CEU, its students, and to area miners as well.

"There's nothing that he's been unwilling to do to provide support for the people of this area," Thomas continued. "I don't have words sufficient to describe his contribution."

Other familiar faces are also exiting the Legislature.

In Thursday's wee hours, Sen. Bill Hickman, R-St. George, announced he would not seek re-election.

"It's time to say goodbye and that's what I'm doing tonight," Hickman tearfully told the body. "After 16 years, it has to be."

In recent days, Salt Lake City Democrat Roz McGee - elected to the House in 2002 - revealed she would not seek another term.

The period to file for county and state offices opens today and continues through March 17.

— Robert Gehrke and Sheena Mcfarland contributed to this story


IN OUR VIEW: A SALUTE TO SEN. DMITRICH
(Source: Daily Herald, 3/11/08)

State Sen. Mike Dmitrich of Price, is being hailed, deservedly, for his 40 years in the State Legislature.

The senator from the 27th District, which includes part of Utah County as well as Carbon County, has announced his retirement after four decades in the Utah Legislature. First elected to the state House in 1968 at age 31, he rose to the post of minority leader, which he held from 1983 to 1990. Appointed to the state Senate in 1991, he won election the following year, and became Senate minority leader 10 years later.

His tenure in office is said to be the second longest in the Legislature's history. That's 1,800 days of legislative sessions, plus many days and hours for special sessions, meetings, campaigns and other duties, not to mention calls from constituents. Anyone who's seen what legislators go through at a session can only be impressed by such dedication. Voters complain, rivals snipe, journalists question -- and while there's no doubt that it's all a healthy part of the democratic process, there's also no doubt that it can be a wearing profession. Dmitrich deserves respect for enduring over that time, while remaining an engaging, active legislator.

Another way to understand that span of time is to look back at a political Utah that seems in many ways far away. When Dmitrich was first elected, Utah had a little more than 1 million residents, and two congressional districts. Richard Nixon beat Hubert Humphrey for president, and Democratic Gov. Calvin Rampton was re-elected easily.

Utah has changed much since then. The population doubled to 2 million by 1996, and has now soared to 2.7 million with 3 million in sight. It now has three congressional districts, and there have been efforts to add a fourth. The last Democratic governor, Scott Matheson, left office 23 years ago. Yet despite all the changes, Dmitrich has continued to help lead his party, and has remained well-liked and effective.

What made him able to serve so long, and, in the main, so successfully? Part of it must come from his background. He started his working life as a miner, as his father and a grandfather had been; he has also been a mining executive and consultant, and worked in banking. That gave him a well-rounded look at what people of his area need, and of what it takes to provide for those needs. He has never let partisanship keep him from pursuing real answers to problems.

His avocation as a high school football and basketball referee may also have come in handy. He plainly is a man who is willing to make the tough calls, and to be fair. Testimonials to his skill and evenhandedness come from colleagues on both sides of the aisle and from the press. We doubt anyone could last four decades as a lawmaker unless he or she was able to rise above the occasional quarrels and the inevitable defeats, while keeping the respect of all his or her peers and the friendship of many in both parties.

Consider his role in this last session. He sponsored Senate Bill 224, the Coal Mine Safety Act, which created the Utah Office of Coal Mine Safety. Passed by the Legislature, it creates a one-person Utah Office of Coal Mine Safety and a 13-member technical advisory committee. A response to the Crandall Canyon mine disaster, the law aims to improve mine safety without creating a cumbersome and ineffective bureaucracy. By all indications, Dmitrich's concern for the people who work in the mines, his skill as a legislator, and well as his understanding of how legislation can be really effective played crucial roles in this effort to keep miners safe.

We thank Mike Dmitrich for his four decades of service. We doubt we will see many, or any, like him again in the Utah Legislature.

 

WORKERS' COMP GETS NEW ACCIDENTS DIVISION DIRECTOR
(Source: Mike Gorrell, Salt Lake Tribune, 3/8/08)

Larry Bunkall, longtime president of the Utah Manufacturers Association and most recently a Kennecott Utah Copper official, has been named director of the Utah Labor Commission's industrial accidents division.

The division administers the workers' Compensation Act, which provides medical care and lost wages to injured workers in exchange for employer immunity from employees' personal injury lawsuits. Bunkall replaces Joyce Sewell, who retired.

Besides the government experience gained representing manufacturers at the Legislature, Bunkall has been vice president of the Utah Retail Grocers' Association and a west Valley city Council member.

He also is a past member of the Workers' Compensation Advisory Council and has served on task forces and study committees assessing labor issues, workplace safety and the workers' compensation system.

 

HUNTSMAN'S 2ND TERM GOALS:
HEALTH CARE REFORM, ENDING FOOD SALES TAX
(Surce: Robert Gehrke, Salt Lake Tribune, 3/12/08)

Armed with broad popularity and deep pockets, Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr. filed Tuesday to seek re-election, a formality for the governor who for months has not concealed his plan to seek a second and, he says, final term in office.

He will likely face Democrat Bob Springmeyer, a management consultant from Salt Lake City, who anticipates filing for office sometime before the Monday deadline and said that he recognizes that running against Huntsman will be a major undertaking.

A poll conducted earlier this year for The Salt Lake Tribune found that 78 percent of Utahns thought Huntsman was doing a good or excellent job as governor.

As governor, Huntsman has avoided scandal and seen strong economic growth during most of his term, although the state's economic boom is showing signs of slowing down, along with the rest of the country.

During his tenure, he also boasts a 19 percent increase in education funding and a major overhaul of the Utah tax code.

But he has irritated some conservatives in his party by signing onto the Western Climate Change Initiative, which seeks to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and by his delayed, lukewarm support for the public-school voucher campaign. He also stirred controversy by applying 11th-hour pressure on lawmakers to approve a deal to finance the Real Salt Lake soccer stadium.

In his second term, Huntsman has said that he hopes to complete a major health care reform initiative that was started during this year's legislative session; push for the complete repeal of the state sales tax on food, which was partially phased out last year; and a continued commitment to increasing education funding and teacher pay.

Huntsman has been mentioned in some quarters as a potential vice presidential running mate of Arizona Sen. John McCain. The governor dismisses that speculation, but says he will continue to campaign for the senator, whom he considers a friend.

 

CEU LEADER STEPS DOWN
(Source: Brian Maffly, Salt Lake Tribune, 3/25/08)

Ryan L. Thomas, the president of the College of Eastern Utah, announced his resignation Monday after seven years at the helm of the Price community college. In a statement, he specified only a desire to "pursue other opportunities" to explain his exit, effective at the end of the academic year

"For the past seven years, Ann and I have been honored to be a part of the College of Eastern Utah," he said. "We are proud to be part of a community of professionals committed to education and service."
From the beginning of his tenure, however, the 55-year-old Thomas had always indicated he planned to spend just seven years as the college's president and had no desire to end his career in administration, according to college spokesman Brad King

A lawyer by training, Thomas has a long history both in front of the blackboard and in the boardroom, coming to CEU from Utah Valley State College where he served in a variety of vice presidential roles. Earlier, he served Idaho's former Ricks College as general counsel

Thomas was credited with helping turn around CEU's shaky financial footing and returning the institution to solvency. By 2006, the college had erased its deficit; it reported a surplus last year

"President Thomas has made tremendous contributions to CEU as well as to the Utah System of Higher Education," Board of Regents Chairman Jed H. Pitcher said. "We are grateful for his dedication, sacrifice and committed service to the students, the college and this state. He will be missed."

The regents will name an interim president by the end of the year

During Thomas' watch, the 69-year-old college achieved other milestones: the completion of the G.J. Reeves classroom and administration building; a successful round of fundraising that included two significant land donations, the Horse Canyon Mine property and land to site the Prehistoric Museum; receipt of $2.7 million in federal funds for the Western Energy Training Center; the merger with the Southeast Applied Technology College; improved communications with the San Juan Campus in Blanding; and expansion of the college's relationships with the communities of southeast Utah.

 


AT UTAH MINING ASSOCIATION


Return to Top of Page

PRESIDENT'S REPORT

by David A. Litvin

It has always been amazing how quickly things can change, especially when one looks back a year ago compared to our national situation today. Things are definitely different; and change is usually caused by things that are completely unanticipated.

Today, we find the economy of the United States on the rocks from the subprime mortgage debacle, record high energy prices, and the ongoing trauma of the Iraq war. This situation in turn has lead to a credit liquidity crisis that has shaken Wall Street, lead to a massive ongoing financial stimulus by the Federal Reserve, and the inability of companies and the public to get needed monies necessary for economic expansion. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in the United States only increased a feeble 0.6% in the fourth quarter of 2007, and is probably worse today.

The financial and economic crisis in the United States has lead to the historic weakening of the already weak U.S. dollar in foreign currency markets. This, in turn, has further pushed up the prices of commodities across the board. With global uncertainty, gold and oil prices have risen to recent record levels. Foreign made goods are ever increasing in price, and battered U.S. households continue to reduce consumer spending. The troubled U.S. economy and financial markets are having, as expected, a spillover effect on foreign country economies as well. Where all this goes, and how bad it will get, are still unknown.

Warren Buffet, in 2003, characterized the financial derivatives that were being issued to package the subprime mortgages as potential "weapons of mass destruction." These instruments do not trade openly in public exchanges, and financial service firms disclose few details about them to government regulators. In essence, they are a shadow financial market that has increased from around $900 billion in 2003 to over $45 trillion today.

To date Utah's economy has remained relatively strong, but there are clear signs that Utah's economy is not isolated, and is slowing as well. The state's budget surplus for 2007 was 340 million lower than 2006, and the state's economists are projecting a further decline in the state's revenues for 2008.

What all this means for Utah's mining and supplier industries is yet to be seen. The massive Salt Lake City Creek downtown development by the Mormon Church will provide a strong local stimulus until its projected completion in 2011/12. But whether the international supply and demand for commodities will remain in balance will be determined by the severity of the U.S. economic slowdown and its spillover effect on the rest of the world. We also have the potential impact on coal markets of the global climate change issue. To be sure, the next 12-24 months will be challenging times -- but aren't times always a challenge? Be prepared and enjoy what is ahead – if you can.

 


SAFETY

Return to Top of Page

 

CRIMINAL PROBE OF MSHA,
MURRAY ENERGY URGED

(Source: Suzanne Struglinski, Deseret Morning News,

WASHINGTON — A harsh Senate report on the Crandall Canyon Mine accident issued blames Murray Energy and the Mine Safety and Health Administration for last year's disaster that killed nine people.

For the families of those lost in the accident, the report confirms a lot of what they already knew or suspected, according to their attorney.

But Murray Energy and others, including Utah's senators, were quick to point out it is not the final word on the accident.

"This is a comprehensive and very strongly worded report," said Edward Havas, an attorney with the Salt Lake law firm Dewsnup, King & Olsen that represents most of the families of those killed or injured in the accident. "It doesn't pull any punches. It should be a wake-up call for others in the industry that dangerous practices are still going on and should not be tolerated."

The report, issued by Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, known as HELP, is the first report from Congress with at least one other in the works and the MSHA official investigation still under way.

Shortly after the accident, Kennedy requested e-mails, any documents on mine plan changes and MSHA consideration of them, inspection reports, meeting minutes, e-mails, handwritten notes and other communication between the mine owners and MSHA officials, and a variety of others from the Labor Department — many of which are quoted in the report released.

Havas said the report serves as a "good road map" as the firm prepares the families' litigation on the accident.

The HELP committee had a hearing in October and families of the miners and rescuers, along with Gov. Jon Huntsman, Jr., testified before the House Education and Labor Committee a day later.

House and Senate committees have subpoenaed Murray Energy CEO Bob Murray, but it is not clear when he will come to Washington to talk about the accident. The House Education and Labor Committee is still working on its investigation.

Kennedy said the 75-page report's finding warrants a criminal investigation by the Justice Department.

"The committee's investigation has revealed that the owner of Crandall Canyon Mine, Murray Energy, disregarded dangerous conditions at the mine, failed to tell federal regulators about these dangers, conducted unauthorized mining and — as a result — exposed its miners to serious risks," Kennedy said.

"MSHA also unconscionably failed to protect miners by hastily rubber-stamping the plan. This is a clear case of callous disregard for the law and for safety standards, and hard-working miners lost their lives."

Despite rescue efforts, the bodies of six miners remain entombed in the mine since an August 2007 collapse in Emery County. Days after the accident, three rescuers died while trying to dig out the men.

According to a summary from Kennedy's office of the report, which is extremely technical in nature, the committee found that Murray Energy and its technical consultant, Agapito Associates, ignored the history of the mine's instability and did not make the right engineering assumption for the mine, while MSHA missed flaws in Agapito's analysis and did not submit plans to the agency's technical staff for review. The report says Murray Energy "ignored substantial evidence of instability during mining operation" and continued to mine for coal even in light of evidence there was danger near the north barrier, among several other conclusions.

"It is disheartening to see how much knowledge the company had prior to the accidents and that they disregarded warning signs," Havas said, referring to several "red flags" Kennedy highlights in the report. "They should have recognized there were very clear signals."

United Mine Workers of America International President Cecil E. Roberts said the report "underscores the need for the enhanced mine safety and health protections."

The House approved a mine-safety bill in January aimed at building on reforms approved by Congress in 2006, although there were some objections to the bill with critics saying the 2006 reforms haven't been given enough of a chance to be implemented yet. Kennedy has his reform proposal, the Miner Health and Safety Enhancement Act of 2007, that he introduced in June and aims to mark-up this year.

In light of the report, Roberts urged the committee to move forward on the bill.

"American coal miners are still dying just because they went to work. We need the enhanced protections the S-MINER Act provides. The terrible events at Crandall Canyon must never be forgotten and never be repeated."

MSHA reminded Kennedy that the official investigation into the accident is still taking place.

"MSHA's Accident Investigation Team is preparing the official investigative report that will determine the root causes of this accident as well as the appropriate enforcement actions, including any criminal referrals," MSHA spokesman Matthew Faraci said via e-mail. "Until the MSHA Accident Report and the DOL Internal Review are concluded, speculation by Senator Kennedy's staff is inappropriate."

Michael O. McKown, general counsel of UtahAmerican Energy, Inc., a subsidy of Murray Energy that operates the mine, said the report "is politically motivated, irresponsible and unjustifiable."

"Mr. Murray and the company would never knowingly expose any employee to danger and he hasn't in his 50 years of experience," McKown said. "For anyone to imply otherwise is blatantly false. Once the facts are known, they will show that Mr. Murray deserves tremendous credit for his courage and leadership under very difficult conditions."

Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, who sits on the HELP Committee with Kennedy, along with the committee's top Republican Sen. Mike Enzi, R-Wyo., and Sen. Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., said Congress should "refrain from rushing to judgments based on incomplete and unofficial evidence."

"(Kennedy's) report is one of a number of inquiries that will shed light on the Crandall Canyon Mine tragedy," Hatch said. "I will weigh the opinions in his inquiry with the official findings in the Inspector General's and Mine Safety and Health Administration's official reports that are due to be released later this year. I'll further examine the findings in all the other ongoing reports on Crandall Canyon."

Sen. Bob Bennett, R-Utah, also said he would consider Kennedy's report but "will withhold any final conclusion until I have reviewed the official report from the Mine Safety and Health Administration."


MSHA MYOPIA: AGENCY FAILS TO DO
ITS DUTY - PROTECT MINERS

(Source: Salt Lake Tribune, 3/13/08)

Coal miners venture underground with a modicum of protection. Air packs provide an emergency oxygen supply. Helmets protect their heads. And the federal Mine Safety and Health Administration, at least in theory, has their backs.

MSHA approves mining plans, inspects mines and enforces mining laws. Its sole responsibility is assuring the health and safety of the nation's 376,000 miners. But, judging by a report from a U.S. Senate committee investigating the deadly August accident at the Crandall Canyon coal mine in Emery County, the agency is more concerned with the health of the industry, and safeguarding mine owners' profit margins.

According to the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, MSHA ignored its own engineer, missed significant flaws in the company's engineering analysis, and approved a dangerous mining plan without a thorough review.

Worse, it allowed itself to be "bullied" by a bellicose mine owner, rushing plan approvals and backing off on enforcement activities at the request of Murray Energy officials.

Intra-agency correspondence reveals that Murray Energy CEO Robert Murray began pressuring MSHA and protesting enforcement efforts just days after purchasing the mine in August 2006. And MSHA caved, repeatedly.

In November 2006, when an MSHA engineer refused to approve a dangerous retreat mining plan to scavenge coal from roof support pillars, he was overruled after another MSHA official met with a mine manager.

And, after a resulting roof collapse halted production and forced Murray Energy to move to a different section of the mine, MSHA hurriedly approved another retreat mining plan without a thorough technical review, after being pressed by the company for a quick decision.

It should come as no surprise that Murray pressured the agency, apparently putting profits before safety. That's what coal companies do. That's what MSHA is supposed to prevent.

Critics have accused MSHA, under the direction of Bush recess appointee and industry insider Richard Stickler, of catering to mining companies. The Senate twice refused to confirm the former mine manager, concerned that safety would suffer. And, judging by the events at Crandall Canyon, it has.

It's time to change the culture at MSHA; to refocus on the core goal of protecting coal miners, not coal production. And those changes must start at the top. Stickler, who has served for 17 months without congressional approval, should resign.

 

EMERY MINE'S COAL OPERATION CITED BY CONSOL ENERGY
(Source: Mike Gorrell, Salt Lake Tribune, 3/18/08)

The Emery Mine in western Emery County has received Consol Energy Inc.'s top award for outstanding safety performance by an underground coal mine in 2007.

Last year, the mine outside of the Emery County city of Emery, had only three recordable accidents and one lost-time injury. That translated to an incident rate of 2.02, best among mines owned by Consol, which has 17 bituminous coal-mining complexes in six states. Those mines produced 4.5 billion tons of coal last year and annual revenues of $3.7 billion. The Emery Mine employs 150 and yielded 1 million tons of coal last year.

Peter B. Lilly, president of Consol's coal group, told mine employees that "what was accomplished last year cannot be forgotten, but must be imitated this year and in the future. At Consol Energy, we are continually renewing and re-establishing our commitment to working safely every day, eliminating all accidents companywide."


COURT REJECTS MSHA CITATION IN WILLOW CREEK MINE BLAST
(Source: Pamela Manson, Salt Lake Tribune, 3/18/08)

A federal appeals court overturned a Mine Safety and Health Administration citation issued in connection with a fatal methane explosion at the Willow Creek mine in 2000.

The citation alleged the accident was the result of a deficient mine-ventilation system, but the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said regulators did not prove mine operator Plateau Mining Corp. "was on notice that its ventilation system was performing inadequately."

The citation was one of two issued by MSHA in connection with the incident, which killed miners Cory Nielsen and Shane Stansfield and injured eight others. The amount of a fine, which can range from $55 to $55,000, was not determined at the time MSHA reached its decision in July 2001.

MSHA spokesman Matthew Faraci said the agency is studying the ruling.

The citation was affirmed by an administrative law judge. Four members of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission later split evenly on the matter, which allowed the citation to stand.

Plateau then appealed to the 10th Circuit. The company said it was operating its ventilation system, designed to dilute methane gas in the mine, in compliance with an MSHA-approved plan.

According to court documents, MSHA had given the plan extra attention because of difficult mining conditions at Willow Creek and a previous fire at the mine. To obtain approval, Plateau agreed to use a more extensive monitoring system than what was in use at most mines, the 10th Circuit noted.

The company and MSHA dispute the precise chain of events, but the cause of the accident was not an issue - a section of the roof collapsed in a mined area, igniting a small pocket of methane.

According to MSHA, this initial ignition came into contact with a small accumulation of methane in the explosive range, disrupting the ventilation system. The disruption, in turn, allowed more methane to accumulate and caused two more explosions, the agency says.

In reversing the citation, the 10th Circuit said merely following a ventilation plan does not preclude a finding of a violation. However, in this case, the court said there was no occurrence that was not anticipated by the plan, indicating "that there was nothing that should have put Plateau on notice that additional action was necessary."

A lawyer for Plateau, Ralph Henry Moore II, had not seen the decision late Monday and had no immediate comment.
— Reporter Mike Gorrell and correspondent Robert Boczkiewicz contributed to this report.

 

INVESTIGATION INTO CRANDALL CANYON
EXPECTED TO WRAP UP IN ABOUT THREE MONTHS

(Source: Mike Gorrell, Salt Lake Tribune, 3/28/08)

The federal Mine Safety and Health Administration's official investigation into the cause of last August's Crandall Canyon mine disaster is likely to be completed in about three months, an agency official said.
Kevin Stricklin, administrator over MSHA's coal division, said the investigative team headed by Richard Gates has conducted all of its interviews, reviewed thousands of documents and currently is writing a draft report at an MSHA facility in Tridelphia, W.Va

He was hesitant to speculate on a more precise completion date, noting that Crandall Canyon mine operator Murray Energy Corp. and its Utah subsidiaries are still submitting information to investigators

"It's our responsibility to go through every page," said Stricklin of the need for a thorough probe of the mining disaster. Six Crandall Canyon miners were entombed Aug. 6 by a massive collapse of the mine's walls. Ten days later, three rescuers were killed and six injured in a second implosion of the tunnel structure

Stricklin was in Salt Lake City to attend a conference on "Deep Coal Mining in Utah." Held at the federal Bureau of Land Management's downtown offices, the conference featured presentations on the seismic monitoring network in Utah's coal country and studies conducted since 2005 by University of Utah mining professors at what is now called the Tower mine

That mine, also owned by Murray Energy, is among the deepest in the West, with longwall mining machines operating 2,500 to 3,000 feet beneath the Book Cliffs. The Crandall Canyon mine collapsed while crews were working 2,000 feet below the surface of the Wasatch Plateau, removing "barrier pillars" of coal previously left behind to support the roof

University of Utah mining professor William Pariseau said his research indicated that the Tower mine's depths required barrier pillars to be about 500 feet wide. The barrier pillars in the shallower Crandall Canyon mine were 450 feet wide before they were whittled back to less than 150 feet just before the disaster

Last week, MSHA fined Murray Energy $420,000 for two flagrant violations of safety regulations at the Tower mine, contending the company repeatedly allowed buildups of potentially explosive coal dust there

Stricklin said MSHA has issued 50 flagrant violation orders, seeking fines totaling $7.1 million, since the repeat-offense citation was created as part of the 2006 Mine Emergency and Response Act, enacted after three Eastern disasters early that year

He said MSHA also is processing two other flagrant violation orders against Murray Energy for repeated safety problems at West Ridge mine in Carbon County

Murray Energy officials said last week they were evaluating the Tower mine order before determining whether to appeal the fine.

 

TAILINGS PILE SAFETY: KENNECOTT VOWS A PROBE
(Source: Judy Fahys, Salt Lake Tribune, 3/28/08)

MAGNA - Kennecott Utah Copper Corp. pledged Thursday to have independent experts double-check the safety of its old mine-waste impoundment, a 1.8-billion-ton pile that for years was judged to be vulnerable if a big earthquake hit

Company President Andrew Harding announced the third-party review to kick off a meeting in the Magna Senior Center, where more than 100 area residents grilled Harding and Kennecott engineers about the tailings and other environmental concerns

Harding also said he could understand why some residents distrust the copper giant in light of revelations this week that former executives hid for two decades that the tailings impoundment might breach in a large temblor and bury their homes in mud

"You should be angry about it," said Harding, who took over the company four months ago. Addressing that distrust is exactly why a separate review is needed, he said

Kennecott insists the impoundment is safe now. Mine waste now goes into a new, modern impoundment that cost about $536 million and took more than a decade to build. The old impoundment is inactive and being drained, although it may take 10 years longer before it meets the state's minimum-safety standards, because the pile at its center remains too saturated

The idea of an independent review is supported by Les Youd, a member of the National Academy of Engineering, one-time chairman of the Utah Seismic Safety Commission and professor emeritus of engineering at Brigham Young University

Youd pointed out that independent evaluations of seismic safety are typical. He cited U.S. Bureau of Reclamation dams as an example

"That old impoundment should probably get that same kind of independent review," Youd said. "That's the way it's usually done."

Kennecott's new, north impoundment underwent that kind of assessment by experts from Virginia, Arizona and California

But the old one, just to the south, despite its dubious safety, was not part of that review. Records detailing its problems and corrective steps that cost more than $13 million over the past 20 years are scarce in state and federal files. According to a 1997 investigation by a Kennecott attorney, the State Engineer's Office, which oversees dam safety, "colluded" with the company to keep those worrisome reports from public view

In contrast, the state and federal agencies that scrutinized the new impoundment could pore over geotechnical and design details described in 21 thick volumes developed by the company over 15 years

And, while Kennecott says it will provide state regulators with any reports they request, those regulators have indicated they were not aware the company failed to provide any significant reports about the old impoundment

State Dam Safety Director David Marble attended Thursday's meeting and called the review "a very good idea."

"It just helps to verify that what they are saying is correct by having a review by an independent party," said Marble, whose office conducts on-site inspections of both impoundments every other year

Details of how the Kennecott-funded independent review will be conducted, who will do it and when it will be done are all undetermined at this point. But Salt Lake County Councilman Michael Jensen, who lives in Magna, said he would organize the effort and involve residents in it

Harding said it was not the company's role to direct the Utah Attorney General's Office to investigate the cover-up. But, he added, "Kennecott will work with" the office if asked

"We will do our best to ensure it is truly an independent study people can rely upon," he said after the meeting. "At the end of the day, I need people to know what I know, that the impoundment is safe."

 

KENNECOTT QUANDARY: COMPANY SEEKS TO RESTORE PUBLIC TRUST
(Source: Tribune Editorial, Salt Lake Tribune, 3/28/08)

First you say you're sorry, sincerely and succinctly. Next, you come clean, admitting everything. Then you set out to win back the trust - through actions, not words - of those you betrayed

That's the path to redemption for Kennecott Utah Copper Corp., which hopes to mend a rift in its relationship with the community, a rift the company created through decades of deceit

For more than 20 years, Kennecott flirted with disaster, and put hundreds of homes and hundreds of lives at risk. An investigative report by The Salt Lake Tribune this week revealed that the company and state regulators were aware that Kennecott's old tailings pond would likely burst in a major earthquake, burying Green Meadows Estates on the outskirts of Magna in mine sludge. But, unconscionably, the public was never informed of the danger

Kennecott President Andrew Harding, who took the reins of the world's second-largest mining firm four months ago, has apologized profusely. And the company cooperated fully with The Tribune, after a confidential Kennecott memo obtained by the newspaper revealed the copper kings have been aware of the danger, and have been secretly attempting to mitigate it, since 1988

Thursday, Kennecott took that crucial third step toward reconciliation. Meeting with the public for the first time since their secrets were revealed, company officials said they will commission an independent review to confirm their claims and assure the public that the now-inactive tailings pond is safe

Kennecott has spent $13 million to drain and stabilize the century-old pond over the past 20 years, a project that will continue for another decade as the company works to dewater 1.8 billion tons of mine waste and take pressure off the dam

While the extreme southeast corner of the inactive impoundment still falls short of the state's minimum earthquake standards, Kennecott and Utah dam safety officials say the improvement project has progressed to a point that the danger has passed. And they're hoping the public will forgive and forget

The independent study, if it's conducted by experts with no prior ties to Kennecott and if it confirms the company's own findings, could go a long way toward allowing the public to forget about the danger the tailings pond posed. Forgiveness could take much longer

 

SAFETY FEARS SHUT DOWN TOWER MINE
(Source: Steven Oberbeck and Robert Gehrke, Salt Lake Tribune, 3/29/08)

UtahAmerican Energy Inc. has shut down its Tower mine near Price for safety reasons, the company announced

UtahAmerican is a Murray Energy Corp. subsidiary that also co-owned the Crandall Canyon coal mine near Huntington, where nine people died in two catastrophic collapses last August. The company said it closed Tower mine because of "recently encountered, unexpected and unusual stress conditions."
P. Bruce Hill, UtahAmerican's president and chief executive, said the safety of the mine's employees was at stake, given unforeseen geological and mining conditions. Most employees will be transferred to UtahAmerican's nearby West Ridge mine, which is being expanded, he said

"Safety is our only initial concern, and we do not believe that the Tower mine can be operated at this time," Hill said, adding that "unforeseen changes in requirements by the [federal] Mine Safety and Health Administration also have contributed to the forced closure of the mine."

Last week, MSHA fined Murray Energy $420,000 for two flagrant violations of safety regulations, contending the Ohio-based company repeatedly allowed buildups of potentially explosive coal dust in Tower

MSHA's Web site indicates there were 11 reported roof falls and wall collapses at the Tower mine during the past year that resulted in five injuries. Last month, MSHA stopped work temporarily until the company repaired damage from a rock fall

The agency also cited the company for failing to submit a roof-control amendment as required by law "when conditions indicate that the plan is not suitable for controlling the roof, face, ribs, or coal or rock bursts."

MSHA's Amy Louviere wrote in an e-mail that "We cannot speculate as to what 'unforeseen changes' UtahAmerican references in its press release."

Tower is among the nation's deepest coal mines. Its longwall mining machines were operating 2,500 to 3,000 feet beneath the Book Cliffs. The Crandall Canyon mine collapses occurred in work areas 2,000 feet below the surface of the Wasatch Plateau

"Following the Crandall Canyon accident, MSHA has been more closely monitoring ground conditions at the [Tower] mine and underground mines with more than 750 feet cover," Louviere said

Mike Dalpiaz, of the United Mine Workers of America in Price, said the safety of the Tower mine, which is not unionized, was questionable even before UtahAmerican decided to shut it down

"It is a very deep mine full of coal dust, methane and hydrocarbons. And lo and behold, right after MSHA comes in and fines them for safety violations, the company determines the mine isn't safe and decides to shut it down," Dalpiaz said

UtahAmerican closed the mine Aug. 27 for several weeks while it performed additional engineering, ground control studies and modification of longwall mining equipment to "further ensure the safety of the employees."

Once studies were completed and several technical changes made, MSHA approved reopening the mine in January. However, mine managers recently observed "unexpected and unusual stress conditions on the longwall section."

It was unclear from the company's statement if it plans to reopen the mine. Susan Etzel, of the Utah Division of Workforce Service's office in Price said her agency is working to find out how many workers might be affected

James Kohler, chief of the solid minerals branch for the Utah Bureau of Land Management, said the company has yet to submit an application to BLM to close the mine, as it is required to do

"As far as we were concerned, they were operating in accordance with the approved plan and we weren't aware of anything that would have changed that," he said

A BLM inspector was in the mine earlier this month, but the report has not been filed, Kohler said

As of late Friday, Murray Energy and Hill had not replied to questions sent by e-mail.

 


COAL

Return to Top of Page

KEEPING COAL IN THE SPOTLIGHT
(Source: Mike Gorrell, Salt Lake Tribune, 3/1/08)

Coal people think their industry is misunderstood.

So they set out last fall to change the hearts and minds of the American public.

They hired R&R Partners, a public relations company with an office in Salt Lake City that was behind the popular "What Happens in Vegas Stays in Vegas" slogan, to develop a $35 million campaign. Its aim is to influence people to think of coal as a cost-efficient source of electricity rather than one of the culprits behind global warming - and to keep coal central to discussions about the country's energy future.

"It's our job to keep coal at the table. It's not there now," said Robert Henrie, a Salt Lake-based principal in R&R Partners and a strategist well acquainted with the bad-news stories that plague coal.

In 1984, he was the spokesman for Emery Mining Corp. when the Wilberg mine caught fire, killing 27 people. His name, face and thoughts were constantly in the news for more than a year, the length of time it took rescuers to extinguish the flames, then dig their way back into the smoldering Emery County mine to retrieve the victims' bodies.

Henrie's expertise was called upon again last fall after four coal mine disasters in 18 months, the last of which occurred just a few miles north of Wilberg - last August's dual wall collapses in the Crandall Canyon mine, where six miners were fatally buried Aug. 6 and three would-be rescuers were killed 10 days later.

In September, R&R Partners secured a contract from the National Mining Association and its partners to develop national advertising and paid media campaigns to boost coal's image.

"The advocates of coal haven't had a lot to advocate for. People have a mindset to build a case against coal, rather than for coal," said Henrie, whose firm's goal is to imprint a positive message in the public consciousness - "Before you write us off, understand the contributions we make."

It is a message touted through an industry organization, Americans for Balanced Energy Choices, on its Web site (www.americaspower .org) and trumpeted in media ads and on billboards in states with high-profile presidential primaries. The coal group even became a sponsor of the CNN/YouTube Democratic Presidential Debate from Las Vegas on Nov. 15.

That the coal industry turned to R&R Partners was not surprising.

R&R is reveling in the fame of having developed the "Stays in Vegas" promotion for the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority, one of the most successful marketing campaigns in recent years.

But the firm is not just an advertising agency, Henrie emphasized, citing its expertise in developing strategic approaches to broad public policy issues, its government and public affairs lobbying capability, and its experience in dealing with the media.

Those attributes have enticed a number of Utah organizations to hire R&R Partners, including Intermountain Health Care and the Utah Transit Authority. Other noteworthy clients include the Los Angeles Department of Water & Power, a co-owner of the Crandall Canyon mine and Sierra Pacific Resources/Nevada Power, which would like to build coal-fired power plants in Nevada.

To service its clients, R&R Partners has 260 employees in offices in Las Vegas, Reno, Phoenix, Salt Lake City and Washington, D.C. It also has entered into a partnership with The Gallatin Group and Phase Line Strategies, dubbed the WestNet Alliance (www.westnetalliance.com), to help clients in 10 Western states deal with critical issues, from gaming and aquaculture to timber and public utilities.

Henrie figures prominently in the coal campaign.

Before joining Emery Mining's parent company, Savage Industries, which had a contract to operate Utah Power & Light's coal mines, Henrie was an aide to Rep. James Santini, D-Nev.

Henrie also was chief of staff to the House Mines and Mining subcommittee and worked closely with the U.S. Bureau of Mines, American Mining Congress and mining companies on legislation and campaigns promoting national awareness of strategic minerals.

"Santini was a big proponent of geothermal energy during a period [the late 1970s] when there was a national resolve not to get caught up again in an energy crisis similar to what plagued Jimmy Carter's administration," Henrie said. "But 25 years later, we're no better off than we were then. Our reliance on foreign oil hasn't changed. Our development of resources hasn't changed."

What also hasn't changed, he added, is the country's dependence on coal as a source of affordable energy.

Coal-fired power plants generate 50 percent of the electricity used in the United States, a percentage Henrie does not expect to change much despite the resurgence of the nuclear power industry and increasing attention on renewable resources, such as wind power.

In addition, the U.S. still has ample supplies of coal, an estimated 200 years' worth based on current production.

"We have a stable, reliable, independent, inexpensive source of energy - the only one we have," he said. "What will be the cost to our economy when we write off our least-expensive and most-abundant source of energy?"

Henrie contends that coal industry leaders recognize global warming as a "real issue. They get it. They aren't arguing whether it's real or not. They're concentrating instead on, 'What do we have to do to develop the technology to capture carbon emissions?' "

He said the emphasis on developing clean coal technology not only will help reduce harmful emissions from coal-fired power plants but also advance research into carbon sequestration, which involves storage of atmosphere-damaging carbon gases until a useful purpose can be found for them.

Developing this technology, Henrie insisted, also is crucial to worldwide efforts to combat global warming.

"The rest of the world won't stop burning coal. But the rest of the world will use clean coal technology if we make it. China won't build it on its own."

Environmental groups are not buying his message.

"Coal is one of the most polluting sources of energy available, jeopardizing our health and our environment," contends the Sierra Club. Its perspective is reflected in the title of one of its publications, "The Dirty Truth About Coal: Why Yesterday's Technology Should Not Be Part of Tomorrow's Energy Future."

"We owe it to our children to consider smarter, cleaner, healthier options for meeting our energy needs rather than locking ourselves into using a polluting, backward technology for the next 50 years that harms people, damages our environment and makes global warming much worse," the Sierra Club added.

Grist, an online environmental blog, described the multimillion-dollar publicity effort as "coal's desperate campaign for survival" and decried its approach as a "dirty agenda . . . dirty ads . . . dirty political targeting . . . and dirty lies."

Henrie shakes off the criticisms.

"People are much more environmentally sensitive and responsible," he acknowledged. "They want to hear there's an easy way out, but that doesn't change the reality that there's not an easy way out."

 

NEW STUDY IN UTAH EXAMINES EFFECTS OF
LONGWALL MINING ON WATER RESOURCES

(Source: Dana Dean and Brian McPherson, Enterprise Business Newspaper, 3/17/08)

Water users and coal mining operations have coexisted along the Wasatch Plateau for almost 150 years. In recent years, as longwall (full extraction) mining expands, and as population-driven water needs increase, the effects of coal mining on water resources have become a focal issue. The underground panels (void spaces) induced during longwall mining can be up to 15 feet high, 1,500 feet wide and two to three miles long. Generally, a series of these panels is utilized to extract coal in a single mine. As the voids are created, the weight of the rocks above the void causes all layers of rock between the void and the surface to bend and/or break in response.

Because of this rock deformation, longwall mining can cause changes in surface and groundwater hydrology immediately above and adjacent to the mined area. Springs may dry up in some locations, appear in others or drop into the alluvium, while streams may lose or gain flow in different sections. Such hydrologic changes can affect irrigation planning, water rights, ecosystems and wildlife. Measured and perceived hydrologic changes throughout the Wasatch Plateau have concerned mining companies and water users alike. State and federal permitting agencies and environmental groups are scrutinizing the mine-permitting process as the potential for mining- related hydrologic changes increases.

To obtain a permit, a mining company must identify important water resources in and adjacent to their permit area, and continue to measure the flow and quality of those resources throughout the mining and reclamation phases of the mine. This allows a comparison of pre- versus post- mining quantity and quality, and the identification of mining impacts to hydrologic resources. In most cases, the hydrologic impacts from coal mining identified in Utah are reparable and, where possible, the mining companies have repaired such damage quickly and successfully.

However, because of seasonal climate changes, human error and inconsistency, magnitude of change versus magnitude of measurement and location of hydrologic paths, some impacts are not easily detected. Some hydrologic changes can also be difficult or even impossible to repair. A better understanding of where such irreparable changes may or may not occur could save mining companies money and time and help them to create efficient mine plans that minimize hydro-logic impacts. At the same time, it would give water users, regulators and environmentalists more assurance that the area's water resources are being protected.

A goal of a collaborative study conducted by the Division of Oil, Gas and Mining and the University of Utah is to illuminate the processes that may cause significant hydrologic changes in long- wall mining environments. In this work, we are using a hydromechanical (poroelastic) approach to analyze the likely effects of longwall coal mining-induced subsidence on surface and groundwater resources. The study is utilizing comprehensive mathematical models (computer simulations) of longwall mines, including appropriate geologic and hydrologic data from actual mines in the Wasatch Plateau. These models make it possible to predict where permeability changes (especially fractures) are likely to occur as a result of mining and associated rock deformation. Specifically, this new study is focusing on:

  • Hydrologic changes associated with longwall mining due to increased or decreased permeability (fracturing and/or compaction) in rock layers between a coal seam and the surface.
  • The dominant hydrologic controls in different types of rock, whether fracturing, faulting, pore-collapse, rock-swelling or other mechanisms.

This new study relies on robust observations of hydrology, boundary conditions and land subsidence. Data required are geologically based, including rock type or lithology, including elevations of each layer, rock strength (mechanical strength), porosity, hydraulic conductivity and other properties. Much of these data have been made available through Canyon Fuel Co.

Results to date include calculated predictions of hydrologic effects of long-wall mining. Simulated effects are consistent with what few hydrologic observations we have at both the Skyline and Sufco mines. However, the uncertainty associated with the simulated results is tremendous because of a lack of detailed, high- resolution subsurface data. Historic and current hydrologic data for the study area are being gathered to determine what effects mining has had on springs and streams. Much of these data are also available through the USGS, Canyon Fuel Co. and the Utah Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining.

In summary, while such model analyses are able to predict subsidence and associated deformation, the uncertainty (error) of the results is significant because of lack of high-resolution data. However, this type of analysis is invaluable for evaluating how mines and groundwater systems interact in general, and can provide bounds on possible hydrologic impacts. Results of this study will be provided to aid mine planning and reviews, identifying areas where greater measures should be taken to protect water resources.


AIR FORCE WANTS TO POWER ITS JETS WITH COAL, BUT IS IT WORTH IT?
(Source: Matthew Brown, Associated Press, 3/23/08)

MALMSTROM AIR FORCE BASE, Mont. - On a wind-swept air base near the Missouri River, the Air Force has launched an ambitious plan to wean itself from foreign oil by turning to a new and unlikely source: coal

The Air Force wants to build at its Malmstrom base in central Montana the first piece of what it hopes will be a nationwide network of facilities that would convert coal into cleaner-burning synthetic fuel

Air Force officials said the plants could help neutralize a national security threat by tapping into the country's abundant coal reserves. And by offering itself as a partner in the Malmstrom plant, the Air Force hopes to prod Wall Street investors - nervous about coal's role in climate change - to sink money into similar plants nationwide

''We're going to be burning fossil fuels for a long time, and there's three times as much coal in the ground as there are oil reserves,'' said Air Force Assistant Secretary William Anderson. ''Guess what? We're going to burn coal.''
Tempering that vision, analysts say, is the astronomical cost of coal-to-liquids plants. Their high price tag, up to $5 billion apiece, would be hard to justify if oil prices were to drop. In addition, coal has drawn wide opposition on Capitol Hill, where some leading lawmakers reject claims it can be transformed into a clean fuel. Without emissions controls, experts say coal-to-liquids plants could churn out double the greenhouse gases as oil

''We don't want new sources of energy that are going to make the greenhouse gas problem even worse,'' House Oversight Committee Chairman Henry Waxman, D-Calif., said in a recent interview

The Air Force would not finance, build or operate the coal plant. Instead, it has offered private developers a 700-acre site on the base and a promise that it would be a ready customer as the government's largest fuel consumer

Bids on the project are due in May. Construction is expected to take four years once the Air Force selects a developer

Anderson said the Air Force plans to fuel half its North American fleet with a synthetic-fuel blend by 2016. To do so, it would need 400 million gallons of coal-based fuel annually

With the Air Force paving the way, Anderson said the private sector would follow - from commercial air fleets to long-haul trucking

Coal producers have been unsuccessful in previous efforts to cultivate such a market

The Air Force's involvement comes at a critical time for the industry. Coal's biggest customers, electric utilities, have scrapped at least four dozen proposed coal-fired power plants over rising costs and the uncertainties of climate change

That would change quickly if coal-to-liquids plants gained political and economic traction under the Air Force's plan.

 

 


ENERGY

Return to Top of Page

RENEWABLE ENERGY A MUST FOR UTAH, BUT WITHOUT STEEP PRICE HIKES
(Source: Curtis Bramble and Mike Dmitrich, Salt Lake Tribune, 3/4/08)

Even before Benjamin Franklin conducted his famous kite experiment, humans were trying to understand and harness the power of electricity. Thomas Edison forever changed the way we light our homes and now we power an ever-increasing range of electronic devices with just the flip a switch.

As we continue to increase our consumption and demand for power, Utah faces an immense challenge in developing a well-balanced energy policy for the future. Just as the great inventors of our past devised ways to harness the power of electricity, the great minds of our time must now turn their focus toward delivering a cost-effective, balanced and increasing clean stream of power. We must increase the diversity of our sources of electricity while continuing to provide that energy to consumers at costs lower than most states nationally.

Low electricity prices compared with other states is a crucial economic development tool and a benefit to citizens that Utah cannot afford to lose. To ensure we retain this energy advantage, we must address Utah's specific needs, rather than follow what states on the West and East coasts are doing.

Senate Bill 202 crafts a truly innovative approach to achieving these objectives. Similar to other states, it provides powerful incentives for electric utilities to seek generation diversity through the development of cost-effective wind, solar, geothermal and other renewable sources. But it does more. It removes many of the barriers to the development of renewable resources identified by both utilities and independent power producers.

It provides a mechanism for consumers who elect to install renewable energy projects to receive renewable energy certificates and the financial benefits associated with ownership of those certificates. It recognizes that development of renewable resources alone will be insufficient to meet the growing needs of Utah's consumers. It encourages utilities to acquire or develop electric energy from other zero-carbon-emitting sources, including energy efficiency. Finally, it directs Utah's utilities to take these actions while retaining the cost-effective standard for the acquisition of new electric generation.

SB202 was criticized because it does not mandate that utilities use an arbitrary level of renewable power by an arbitrary date. A mandate would dramatically increase energy prices. In contrast to a mandate, SB202 requires utilities to acquire at least 20 percent of the power consumed by Utahns to come from renewable sources by the year 2025, to the extent it is cost-effective to do so.

This cost-effective requirement is better than an arbitrary mandate for two reasons. First, it provides the correct incentive to renewable energy producers to produce competitively priced energy. Second, the cost-effective requirement's flexibility protects consumers from price shocks, should renewable energy continue to be an expensive alternative.

In addition, SB202 realistically anticipates Utah's future energy needs. Utah's explosive growth will need more than just renewable power to keep the lights on. This bill therefore gives state government a sensible role in developing technology to produce clean coal power.

There has seldom been energy legislation in Utah with the broad support enjoyed by this bill. We must deal with the complex issue of diversifying electric resources used to serve Utah's consumers and reducing carbon emissions, while retaining our energy cost advantage. This benefits all sectors of the economy.

Many of the original concepts of the bill were made public in November. Since then, a diverse coalition of stakeholders worked together to develop a holistic approach to addressing Utah's energy challenge. Consumer groups representing electricity users large and small, independent power producers and renewable resource developers who will be offering projects and energy sales to Utah's electric utilities, together with all of Utah's electric utilities, contributed to this legislation.

Energy prices will likely increase as a result of growing consumer demand, the need for new infrastructure and the cost of fuel. Consumers should not, however, carry the added cost burden of poorly developed legislation. SB202 achieves the goals the governor has established for the state's energy future, which are diversity and a reduction in carbon emissions, while retaining Utah's cost-effective standard for the acquisition of new electric generation.

SB202 directs Utah electric utilities to further reduce carbon emissions through continued investment in cost-effective zero-carbon electricity, with a focus on renewable sources. It also removes unnecessary impediments to renewable energy investment and creates new opportunities for electric consumers. This bill, crafted by all the stakeholders of Utah energy policy and development, lays the foundation for the next generation of energy policy in Utah.
--- Sen. Curtis Bramble, R-Provo, is majority leader of the Utah Senate. Sen. Mike Dmitrich, D-Price, is the Senate minority leader.

 

GOVERNMENT OFFERING GRANTS FOR ENERGY PROJECTS
(Source: Dawn House, Salt Lake Tribune, 3/15/08)

The federal government will accept $220.9 million in loan and grant applications under the Renewable Energy Systems and Energy Efficiency Improvements Program.

Applicants may seek loan guarantees to cover up to 50 percent of a project's cost, not to exceed $250,000 for energy-efficiency improvements and $500,000 for renewable energy systems.

The deadline for grant-only applications during the first competitive window is April 15. For the second competitive window, grant-only applications must be submitted no earlier than April 15 and no later than June 15. And deadline for loan guarantees and loan-grant combinations is June 16.

For more information, visit www.rurdev.usda.gov/ut

 

BUSINESS GROUPS CAMPAIGN AGAINST CLIMATE-CHANGE BILL
(Source: Associated Press, 3/20/08)

BILLINGS, Mont. - Energy companies and other business interests have launched a nationwide campaign to undercut climate-change legislation pending in Congress, saying it could cost millions of jobs, drive gasoline prices sharply higher and suck thousands of dollars from household incomes

The effort comes as the Senate prepares to take up in coming months a bill that would cut greenhouse emissions by up to 65 percent by 2050. The bill would create a cap-and-trade system for greenhouse gas emissions, forcing companies to pay to pollute

Industry-funded economists said the legislation threatens to sacrifice three to four million jobs over the next two decades, as higher energy prices dampen industrial production

Higher gas and electricity prices also would take a bite out of workers' paychecks, to the tune of up to $6,700 a year by 2030, said Margo Thorning, chief economist with the American Council for Capital Formation, whose supporters include ExxonMobil

''The link between economic growth and energy can't be broken,'' Thorning said. ''There will be cutbacks in production, losses in productivity.''

 

 



Return to Top of Page

KENNECOTT MAY GIVE UP WETLANDS
(Source: The Salt Lake Tribune, 3/5/08)

Kennecott Utah Copper would transfer ownership of 616 acres of wetlands, near Lakepoint in Salt Lake County, to The Nature Conservancy as part of an environmental restoration plan. The public is invited to comment on the draft plan through April 2.

The land transfer is part of a settlement agreement between Kennecott and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as compensation for contamination of the North Zone Wetlands near Interstate 80 in Tooele County, according to a statement from the federal government. The Wildlife Service contends the North Zone Wetlands were contaminated by groundwater flowing from Kennecott's smelter.

Although Kennecott has admitted no guilt, the company has stopped contaminated water from flowing to the North Zone Wetlands and has dredged contaminated soil, said Chris Cline, spokeswoman for the Wildlife Service. As part of the draft agreement, Kennecott would construct a pipeline and canal system to improve water flow to the Lakepoint Wetlands and provide funding for the costs of ownership and management.

The draft restoration plan can be viewed and downloaded at http://www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/nrda/lakepointwetlands/index.html. Comments also can be sent to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2369 West Orton Circle, Suite 50, West Valley City, 84119. - Christopher Smart.


GROUP: 'EXTREME ENVIRONMENTALISTS'
ARE HARMING THE POOR AND MINORITIES

(Source: Patty Henetz, Salt Lake Tribune, 3/8/08)

The Congress of Racial Equality is rolling out a new environmental justice campaign that focuses on "extreme environmentalists" such as wilderness advocates, charging them with harming poor people and minority groups.

Niger Innis, CORE's national spokesman, attended a news conference this week at the Utah Capitol to announce the consumers' campaign, which he is taking across the nation.

Innis, son of civil rights leader Roy Innis, said environmental organizations intimidate governments and have a trickle-down effect on minorities.

"You can't have economic development in my community when my community is worrying about paying their gas bill," Innis said.

Innis has a growing reputation as a conservative who questions environmentalists' "pseudoscience" and condemns what he calls the global green movement's oppression of poor people in the Third World.

Earlier in the week, Innis spoke to members of the Colorado Legislature during a news conference held to oppose efforts to restrict energy development there. Colorado news organizations reported the media event was organized with the help of Colorado-based Americans for American Energy.

AAE associate Jim Sims accompanied Innis at the news conference in Utah, held on the last day of the legislative session. There, Innis was surrounded by state lawmakers who congratulated the CORE effort.
"I remember his father, Roy Innis, who marched with Martin Luther King [Jr.]," said Rep. Mike Noel, R-Kanab.

AAE in January circulated a missive linking wilderness supporters with terrorists.

CORE will sue the Bush administration if the polar bear is designated an endangered species, Innis said later.

Innis said CORE receives donations from a wide variety of sources, including energy companies. "Quite frankly, we should be getting more, given our position," he said.


PACIFICORP WILL DEFEND COAL-FIRED PLANT'S AIR POLLUTION PERMIT
(Source: Judy Fahys, Salt Lake Tribune, 3/10/08)

Backers of a proposed coal-fired power plant in central Utah won the right last week to defend their air-pollution permit.

Pacificorp and the Utah Associated Municipal Power Systems, calling themselves the "Development Committee," persuaded the Utah Air Quality Board to let them join the fight against the Utah chapter of the Sierra Club over the permit. The Development Committee wants to go forward with Unit 3, a new 950 megawatt coal-fired unit at the Intermountain Power Plant near Delta, and protect the millions of dollars already invested. But the committee is in court over the resistance of some of its former partners - a group of California municipalities including the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power. The group has a majority interest in the Delta power plant.

The Sierra Club, saying regulators never should have granted the permit in 2004, is appealing the state's decision to allow the new coal-fired plant. But the case has been on hold for months because of the dispute between the Development Committee and the Californians.

"Our purpose in intervening is obviously to defend our rights," said Michael Keller, arguing before the Air Quality Board on behalf of the Development Committee last week.

Attorney Joro Walker, representing the Sierra Club, urged the panel to reject the request. She noted that the former partners had refused to sign the state's change-of-ownership form needed to transfer the air permit to the Development Committee.

She also pointed out that the court could well decide the Development Committee doesn't own the permit, which means it might have no right to a place in the appeal.

"The proper course is to wait for the court to decide the issues," she told the Air Quality Board.

The Sierra Club went to the state Supreme Court two years ago for the right to dispute the permit. The group says it was wrong for the Utah Division of Air Quality to grant a permit for the Unit 3 project because the plant would impair visibility of the national parks downwind, including Capitol Reef, and because the plant was not required to use the latest clean-coal technology.

With the board's unanimous ruling last week, the appeal can now move forward. The board will hear evidence from both sides, with the state's lawyers teamed up with the Development Committee to defend the permit.

State regulations give the Air Quality Division the job of reviewing applications for any kind of polluting facility to make sure up-to-date technology is used and to assess its projected pollution output. The pollution of all key facilities is capped to meet standards set by the federal government that are aimed at protecting the health of people and the environment.

The permit granted for Unit 3, for instance, essentially limits the volume of pollution the plant would be allowed to release.

California passed a law in 2006 that has such a tough greenhouse gas emission limit that, in effect, it prevents any new energy from coming from a coal-fired plant like the proposed Unit 3.

The California partners, which get roughly three-fourths of all the power generated from IPP Units 1 and 2, have withdrawn their support for Unit 3 since enactment of that law.

Last summer, their attorney withdrew from the Sierra Club appeal case.


GREENS: MINE CLAIMS CROWD TOWNS
(Source: Thomas Burr, Salt Lake Tribune, 03/12/08)

WASHINGTON - Mining activity is encroaching on cities and towns in Utah because of an outdated 19th-century law, potentially posing serious problems for residential areas, an environmental group said.

The number of mining claims within five miles of cities and towns in the state shot up almost 150 percent in the last five years, the Environmental Working Group says, from 2,786 to 6,793.

Overall, there are now 34,516 mining claims in the state as of January 2008 compared with just 8,723 in 2003, the group says in a new study conducted in part with the Pew Campaign for Responsible Mining. That's a dramatic increase likely pushed by a boost in prices for gold, silver, copper, uranium and other metals, the group says.

"The data show that claims and communities are on a collision course in the West," said Jane Danowitz, director of the Pew Campaign. "This potential crash is due in large part to the nation's frontier-era mining law, which places few restrictions on where and how mining can take place on western public lands."

The Environmental Working Group and the Pew Campaign are lobbying to overhaul the 1872 Mining Law, which hasn't been touched since it was put into place and now is being used to stake thousands of claims to parcels on public lands to dig up precious metals.

The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee will hold a second hearing today and is expected to vote on a reform bill next month changing the law to provide more say-so to states and communities affected by metals mining.

"The law that governs the mining of gold, uranium and other hard-rock metals made sense when it was signed into law by President Ulysses S. Grant in 1872 to encourage development of the West," Danowitz said on a conference call with reporters. But, "Since 1872, the West has changed more dramatically perhaps than any other region of the country."

The report released says the largest percentage increase within five miles of an incorporated area of Utah was near New Harmony in southwestern Utah. That community saw a 2,400 percent increase in claims from Jan. 1, 2003 to this year. La Sal, a small town near Arches National Park, saw claims jump more than 1,000 percent. And claims near Wendover, Utah, shot up by more than 400 percent, the group says.

The National Mining Association responded to the report, arguing that the numbers are misleading because only 5 percent of mining claims ever become operating mines.

Additionally, NMA spokesman Luke Popovich says communities and individuals have "ample" opportunity to oppose the mines under the National Environmental Protection Act and laws governing Bureau of Land Management areas at the time operating plans are filed on the claims. On the back end, he added, communities and individuals can oppose the release of bonds put up by the mining operators if they do not meet their responsibility to reclaim those lands.

What's more, Popovich added, the strongest support for hard-rock mining comes from the mining communities, who rely on the operations for a large part of their economic base.

The House passed legislation last November that would change the 1872 law to allow a state, political subdivision or Indian tribe to petition the Interior Department to remove specific federal lands from claimable territory to protect valuable and important areas.

The legislation also would impose a 4 percent royalty fee on existing permits and establishes a civil penalty for failure to comply with royalty payments. It also would protect several areas from mining claims: wilderness study areas, areas of "critical environmental concern," areas designated to be included in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System and any area inside a roadless area as determined by the Forest Service.


UTAHNS PRAISES CLOSURE OF MERCURY-SPEWING NEVADA PLANT
(Source: Judy Fahys, Salt Lake Tribune, 3/13/08)

Nevada environmental officials have shut down a gold-ore plant until it can scrub more mercury pollution from its smokestacks.

The gold "roasters" have been suspected of contaminating lakes, streams and wildlife with a dangerous form of the metal, so Nevada's move won support from downwinders in Utah and Idaho.

"This is a bold action they've taken," said Cheryl Heying, director of the Utah Department of Air Quality. "It shows they have teeth, and they can bare them."

Nevada had a voluntary program for years but implemented tougher, mandatory regulations last year. Now reports of mercury emissions are required and checked.

Two other companies have successfully cut their pollution under the new program, but roasters operated by Yukon-Nevada Gold Corp. at Jerritt Canyon, north of Elko, had been under investigation for more than a year. The Nevada Department of Environmental Protection directed the Jerrit Canyon plants to shut down by March 17 until they can get the mercury out of emissions.

"These events demonstrate not only that the incentives we've built into the program are producing early emissions reductions, but also that the regulations contain strong enforcement provisions," said agency administrator Leo Drozdoff.

No clear link has been proven yet between Nevada's gold roasters and pollution in neighboring states. But it was only two weeks ago that the Utah Legislature approved $100,000 to buy a monitor to help track the microscopic mercury particles that many believe are drifting from Nevada.

In 2004, scientists discovered the highest levels of toxic methylmercury ever measured in a natural water body in the Great Salt Lake.

Methylmercury is the toxic form of mercury after it has been biologically transformed. It poses a public health risk, especially to children and unborn babies.

A neurotoxin, it builds up in the food chain and attacks the neurological system, causing retardation in the unborn and learning disabilities and behavioral problems in children. Humans are exposed most commonly by eating contaminated flesh, usually fish.

Utah has consumption warnings for several fish statewide and four duck species on the Great Salt Lake.

Idaho has similar warnings.

Canadian-based Yukon-Nevada Gold said the shutdown was planned and insisted its mercury controls simply aren't working right yet.

But Justin Hayes of the Idaho Conservation League said the company has been hiding the true volume of its mercury pollution. He called Nevada's shutdown order "a really big deal." He said: "This is the first step to solving this problem."

Lynn de Freitas, director of the Friends of the Great Salt Lake, applauded Nevada's action, too.

"What a responsible thing to do," she said.


WE'RE ALL DOWNWIND: CONVENTIONAL COAL POWER MEANS SMOKE
(Source: Tribune Editorial, 3/13/08)

Folks in Utah's Dixie are riled about the prospect of being downwind of a proposed coal-fired power plant in nearby Mesquite, Nev. They are worried about air quality and haze. It's good that they're worried, and that the Washington County Commission and the mayors of St. George and Springdale have joined the opposition.

This leads us to wonder, however, when other Utahns and their government officials will get the message that coal-fired power, at least with conventional technology, is no longer acceptable, even when large numbers of Utahns are not immediately downwind.

Where's the public outrage about the proposed expansion of the Intermountain Power Project with a new 950-megawatt unit near Delta? Or the 270-megawatt Sevier Power Plant proposed at Sigurd? Or the 110-megawatt Bonanza plant near Vernal?

They will produce the same pollution - mercury, particulates, sulfur dioxide and carbon dioxide (the major greenhouse gas) - as the 750-megawatt Toquop plant proposed near Mesquite. But while local officials in Washington County have joined the opposition, you don't hear the same song in other Utah cities and towns. Heck, many Utah municipal utilities are partners in the deal to get the huge new unit at IPP built.

Even if the folks in Utah don't take a dim view of these plants - they provide high-paying jobs, taxes and electric power, after all - our neighbors in Colorado, Kansas and points east should. That's the thing about air. Everybody's downwind of somebody else.

The conventional argument for conventional coal power is that it's cheap. But people are beginning to factor in the environmental cost of that power, measured in things like lung disease and the haze that obscures views in Utah's national parks. They are coming to the conclusion that conventional coal power is not so cheap after all. Add the role of carbon dioxide emissions in global warming, and the possible effects on Utah's climate, including drought, and the bargain looks even worse.

Apparently, the quiescent Utah Legislature and governor have not yet awakened to the damage pouring from coal-fired stacks. Until they do, and impose tougher air-quality standards, electric utilities won't know which way to jump.

Maybe more Utahns should help their elected officials make up their minds. Because in reality, we're all downwind.

 

MINING GROWTH IRKS LAKE LOVERS
(Source: Tom Wharton, Salt Lake Tribune, 3/25/08)

WILLARD - Hundreds, if not thousands, of migrating pintail ducks and snow geese filled the gray sky on a remote stretch of the Great Salt Lake where Jeff and Lynn Pace and Rich Noble skimmed across the shallow waters northwest of Willard Bay in airboats

"I've seen the sky black with birds," said Lynn Pace, a hunter and lake lover from West Valley City. "It's a wonder of the world so taken for granted."
Airboaters and a coalition of environmental organizations are concerned about a proposed 33,000-acre expansion of dikes and evaporation ponds by Great Salt Lake Minerals (GSLM). They fear the diked ponds would negatively affect millions of birds that use the lake to migrate, feed and nest

Jeff Pace compared the relatively small loss of wetlands in the more controversial Legacy Highway project farther south as the Great Salt Lake equivalent to human fingers. The area of Bear River Bay included in the proposed expansion, he said, is the lake's heart

One thing is certain: Mineral operations on the lake are massive

According to the Mineral Leasing Plan for the Great Salt Lake, current mining operations by all companies on the lake use 171,644 acres for mineral extraction. GSLM's expansion would add 33,000 more

If allowed to expand beyond its current 43,000 acres, GSLM's operation would cover 119 square miles, a land mass larger than Salt Lake City

Approval for the expansion involves the state, which manages the lands under the lake beds, as well as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which must issue permits because the proposal has the potential to harm or destroy wetlands

A coalition of hunting, airboating and environmental organizations who feel the Utah Department of Natural Resources did not consider their concerns when issuing permits for the expansion is challenging the decision-making process in 3rd District and the Utah Supreme courts

A federal environmental impact statement that must be conducted because of potential destruction of wetlands is in its preliminary stages. If all goes as planned, a draft will be out for public comment this fall with a final decision coming in early 2009

Peggy Landon, a spokeswoman for Great Salt Lake Minerals, said last August that the dikes would not hurt the lake and that the permit process will ensure no damage is done

"It is a lengthy process and a process that will give all interested parties a chance to be heard," she said at the time

The debate pits economics and a growing need for domestically produced potash fertilizer against fears that increased mining operations would harm the Great Salt Lake's hemispheric importance to birds.

Effects of expansion

According to a scoping document on the project by the Army Corps of Engineers, Great Salt Lake Minerals "draws naturally occurring brine from the lake into shallow ponds and allows solar evaporation to produce sulfate of potash as well as salt and magnesium chloride minerals. Sulfate potash is a specialty fertilizer that improves the yield and quality of high-value crops such as fruits, vegetables, tea, tree nuts and turf grasses."
The state receives money from the leases. According to Dave Grierson of the Utah Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands, which issued the leases, the state receives $1 per acre per year plus royalties of 66 cents per ton for salt and 5 percent of royalties for other chemicals

Joro Walker, a Salt Lake environmental attorney who represents such groups as the Audubon Society, Sierra Club, Friends of the Great Salt Lake, League of Women Voters, airboaters and hunters, lists 10 effects the expansion could have on the lake

They include turning lake ecosystems into industrial zones, cutting off recreational access to 33,000 acres of the lake, destroying the beauty of the landscape, artificially reducing water levels and availability critical to the ecosystem, and impeding water flow

Environmental groups also worry about impacts to thousands of acres of wildlife and fish habitat. Of particular concern are nesting American pelican colonies at Gunnison Island that are now remote but will be less isolated and more accessible to prey species and human incursion by the new development

There also is concern about Great Salt Lake water quality, especially if concentrations of poisons such as mercury and selenium increase

No one doubts the lake's importance to wildlife

According to the environmental groups, 257 avian species use the Great Salt Lake, with 112 species using different wetlands while 117 species nest on the lake's islands or near its shores

At least 33 species of shorebirds representing 2 million to 5 million individual birds and 5 million waterfowl migrate through the lake. In fact, about 30 percent of waterfowl migrating along the Pacific Flyway depend on the Great Salt Lake's wetlands

None of this surprised the airboaters enjoying a spring day of sightseeing on Bear River Bay. They worry that too much development could doom a place they view as irreplaceable

"We're at the end of the noose and someone's about ready to pull the stool away," said Noble of Syracuse.



ECONOMY

Return to Top of Page

BUFFETT TO BUSH, BERNANKE: WAKE UP, THE RECESSION IS HERE
(Source: Combined News Services, 3/3/08)

OMAHA, Neb. - Contrary to assertions by President Bush and Fed chief Ben Bernanke, billionaire investment wizard Warren Buffett said that the U.S. economy is essentially in a recession even if it hasn't met the technical definition of one yet.

Buffett, whose Berkshire Hathaway Inc. holding company owns home furnisher RC Willey and Rocky Mountain Power in Utah, said in an interview on CNBC the reports he gets from his retail businesses show a significant slowdown in purchases.

Along with the fact that millions of people have lost equity in their homes, ''I would say, by any commonsense definition, we are in a recession,'' Buffett said, but added that it's not clear how deep the recession will go.

The technical definition of a recession is two consecutive quarters of negative growth in the nation's gross domestic product. The Commerce Department reported that the GDP increased at a 0.6 percent pace in the quarter that ended Dec. 31. In the July-September quarter, the economy grew at a brisk 4.9 percent. GDP measures the value of all goods and services produced in the U.S.

Buffett's TV appearance came on the heels of the release last week of Berkshire's 2007 financial report. He also said Berkshire Hathaway had been approached by investors seeking to sell municipal bond holdings that were sinking in value.

Buffett said he bid unsuccessfully for $3.5 billion of municipal bonds. Some bondholders are being pressured by lenders to sell, he said. Top-rated tax-exempt bonds due in 30 years declined for the 14th consecutive day to a three-year low, according to Municipal Market Advisors.

Berkshire held $28 billion in fixed-maturity securities as of Dec. 31. Buffett last year entered the business of insuring municipal bonds, competing with established guarantors struggling to maintain their top credit ratings.

As defaults on mortgage-related securities climbed, Berkshire offered last month to assume $800 billion of municipal bond obligations from MBIA Inc., Ambac Financial Group Inc. and FGIC Corp. in exchange for more than $9 billion in premiums. The companies rejected the offer, Buffett said.


UTAH ECONOMY WILL LIKELY SLOW
IN COMING MONTHS

(Source: Paul Beebe, Salt Lake Tribune, 3/4/08)

Utah's economy is likely to continue to slow in coming months, a monthly Creighton University survey of supply managers and business leaders shows. The university's Business Conditions Index dipped in February to 53.9 from 54.2 in January. An index greater than 50 indicates the economy is expanding.

"Expansions in mining and natural resources will be more than offset by continuing downturns in manufacturing firms tied to domestic sales," Creighton economist Ernie Goss said.

 

ORDERS FOR MANUFACTURED GOODS
FALL 2.5% IN JANUARY

(Source: Salt Lake Tribune, 3/6/08)


U.S. factories saw demand for their products drop sharply, while the country's service sector contracted, fresh evidence of an economy hobbled by housing and credit crises.

The Commerce Department reported that new orders for manufactured goods fell 2.5 percent in January, a deterioration from December's 2 percent increase. It was the biggest decline in five months. Activity in the nation's service sector shrank in February for the second-straight month.

The Federal Reserve, in a new snapshot of nationwide business conditions, reported that the economy has weakened since the start of the year, especially pinching retailers and manufacturers.

Manufacturers, service providers and others are feeling the sting of the economic slowdown. Persisting problems in the housing and credit markets are causing people to be cautious.

 


TRADE DEFICIT GROWS LARGER; IMPORTS REACH ALL-TIME HIGH
(Source: Salt Lake Tribune, 3/11/08)

The United States' trade deficit grew larger in January as imports - including crude-oil prices - zoomed to all-time highs.

The latest snapshot of trade activity, reported by the Commerce Department, showed that the country's trade gap increased to $58.2 billion. That was up from a trade shortfall of $57.9 billion in December and was the highest since November.

Imports of goods and services climbed to a record high of $206.4 billion in January. The United States' voracious appetite for imported crude oil, where prices skyrocketed to the loftiest on record, figured into the increasing demand for overall imports.

The trade gap widened even as exports of U.S.-made goods and services totaled a record high of $148.2 billion in January.


FED RESCUE PLAN CHEERS UP WALL STREET
(Source: Combined News Services, 3/11/08)

Wall Street staged its biggest rally in five years as investors cheered the latest move by the Federal Reserve to shore up the nation's shaky financial system.

Staring at spreading dangers, the Fed announced a rescue package that would pour as much as $200 billion into banks and investment houses and allow them to put up risky home-loan packages as collateral. The hope is to encourage them to lend more freely.

Wall Street rebounded - and hoped the Fed had even more cards to play.

The Fed's maneuver, coordinated with central banks overseas, was its latest effort to stem the global credit crisis and severe housing woes that threaten to bury the United States in its first recession since 2001. Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and his colleagues have been stretching for new and imaginative ways to confront the situation.

They are hoping to bring relief where it is sorely needed: in the market for mortgage securities. Home-loan financing has become much harder to get as nervous lenders have hunkered down.

On Wall Street, the Fed's action propelled stocks upward. The Dow Jones industrials jumped 416.66 points - the biggest one-day point gain since July 29, 2002.

Traders will be looking for still more action. Recent stock rallies have been followed by renewed sell-offs by investors who believe the economy is still headed for recession, if it isn't there already.

Assuming Tuesday's action helps to stabilize turbulent financial markets, that could reduce the chances that the Fed will order a deep, three-quarters of a percentage point cut in its key interest rate next week to further encourage lending and other economic activity. An increasing number of economists believe the Fed is more likely to cut rates by a half-point.

The Federal Reserve announced it would allow squeezed financial institutions - including big investment houses and banks - to borrow up to $200 billion in super-safe Treasury securities by using some of their more risky investments as collateral.

The move makes it less likely that bad debt related to the meltdown in the housing industry will sink a major bank or Wall Street firm, analysts said. Moreover, the Fed is moving in concert with central banks in Canada and Europe, which pledged to inject up to $45 billion into their financial systems.

The coordination with Europe helped strengthen the dollar, which rose slightly against the euro and the yen. The greenback had fallen to record lows against the euro in recent months as the Fed cut rates to bolster the struggling U.S. economy while European bankers held their rates steady.

The Fed said it would provide financial institutions with 28-day loans of Treasury securities, rather than overnight loans. The institutions would pledge other securities - including federal agency residential-mortgage-backed securities, such as those of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac - as collateral for the loans. Fed officials said it's the first time they'll be accepting mortgage-backed securities through this type of lending program.

By allowing financial institutions to put up mortgage-backed securities - for which there's little market appetite - in return for safe securities that are in high demand, the Fed hopes to take pressure off financial companies and make them more inclined to lend to individuals and to businesses.

The Fed's move comes as banks and other financial institutions face cash crunches.


GOLD FUTURES BREAK $1,000 MARK
(Source: Bloomberg News, 3/13/08)

Gold rose above $1,000 an ounce for the first time as mounting credit-market losses spurred demand for bullion as a haven from the sagging dollar and equities.

Silver and platinum also advanced as the dollar dropped below 100 yen for the first time since 1995 and to a record against the euro. Standard & Poor's increased its forecast for bank write-downs related to subprime mortgages to $285 billion. Gold is up 37 percent since the Federal Reserve began cutting interest rates in September, sending the dollar tumbling.

''There is more monetary reflation in the pipes, more interest rate cuts and more flushing of money at the system,'' said Martin MurenAbeeld, chief economist at Toronto-based DundeeWealth Inc., which manages $60 billion in mutual funds and brokerage accounts. ''The easiest thing to say about gold at the moment is to stay long.''

Gold futures for April delivery climbed $13.30, or 1.4 percent, to close at $993.80 an ounce on the Comex division of the New York Mercantile Exchange. The price earlier reached $1,001.50, the highest ever for a most-active contract.

Silver futures for May delivery rose 42.5 cents, or 2.1 percent, to $20.42 an ounce. The metal reached $21.325 on March 6, the highest since October 1980.

''The situation in the U.S. could easily spread further, which means other central banks will try to take steps to support their economy,'' Murenbeeld said.

Gold's all-time inflation adjusted record is $2,284 on Jan. 21, 1980, according to a calculator on the Web site of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. In 1980, when U.S. inflation was running in the double digits and oil was climbing after a decade of Middle East instability, gold reached $873.

''The dollar weakness is systemic and interest rates are headed lower,'' said Robert Gottlieb, managing director and global head of precious metals at Bear Stearns Cos. in New York.

''As long as there's a great deal of financial uncertainty, gold can go higher," he said.


FED TAKES NEW STEPS TO EASE FINANCIAL DOWNTURN
(Source: Jeannine Aversa, Associated Press, 3/17/08)

WASHINGTON The Federal Reserve announced a series of new steps to help provide relief to a spreading credit crisis that threatens to plunge the economy into recession.

The central bank approved a cut to its lending rate to financial institutions to 3.25 percent from 3.50 percent, effective immediately, and created another lending facility for big investment banks to secure short-term loans.

The steps are "designed to bolster market liquidity and promote orderly market functioning," the Fed said in a statement.

"Liquid' well-functioning markets are essential for the promotion of economic growth."

The new lending facility will be available "to financial institutions today.

It will be in place for at least six months and "may be extended as conditions warrant," the Fed said. The interest rate will be 3.25 percent and a range of collateral will be accepted to back the loans.

The Fed also approved the financing arrangement in which JP-Morgan Chase & Co. will acquire rival Bear Stearns Cos.

The deal valued at $2362 million, a stunning collapse for one of the world's largest and most venerable investment banks. The Fed will provide special financing to JP-Morgan Chase for the deal, JP-Morgan Chase said. The central bank has agreed to fund up to $30 billion of Bear Stearns' less liquid assets.

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said he was pleased by the developments.

"Last Friday, I said that market participants are addressing challenges and I am pleased with recent developments. I appreciate the additional actions taken by the Federal Reserve to enhance the stability, liquidity and orderliness of our markets," he said.

The Fed's action comes just two days before the central bank's scheduled meeting on Tuesday, where another big cut to a key interest rate that affects millions of people and businesses is expected to be ordered.

 

FED'S RATE CUT ENERGIZES WALL STREET,
BUT SHADOWS LINGER

(Source: Combined News Services, 3/18/08)

Stocks roared back Tuesday in the biggest daily gains on Wall Street since July 2002 after the Federal Reserve cut its benchmark interest rate by three-quarters of a percentage point, but shadows still hover over the economy.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average shot up 420.41 points, or 3.5 percent, to 12,392.66. The S&P 500 rose 54.14 points to 1,330.74 and the Nasdaq was up 91.25 points to 2,268.26, both up more than 4 percent on the day.

Sustaining Tuesday's rally may prove challenging, however, especially given the Fed's explicit warning that expectations of inflation are rising.

The new warning on inflation, coming very high up in the Fed's statement, was a troubling reminder of how complicated the job has become for the guardian of the U.S. economy.

The Fed is wrestling with a housing-market disaster, and perhaps recession in the broader U.S. economy. Then, too, there are malfunctioning credit markets and investment banks that remain vulnerable to investor runs that could bankrupt them. Now inflation is back on the list of concerns, complicated by sky-high oil prices and a falling dollar.

''Inflation has been elevated, and some indicators of inflation expectations have risen,'' the Fed's Open Market Committee wrote in the third paragraph of its statement announcing two separate rate cuts.

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke is an inflation hawk who has frequently warned that expectations about inflation are as important as inflation itself. That's because if businesses expect inflation - rising prices across the economy - they raise their own prices, helping to spur the problem.

The Fed's public focus on inflation expectations may be designed to bolster the U.S. dollar by alerting the world that the central bank is paying attention. The dollar's value has slid against major currencies as investors feared that the Fed was willing to tolerate rising inflation - which weakens the dollar's purchasing power - in order to boost the slumping U.S. economy.

President Bush, eager to reassure a rattled country, said that his administration is ready to intervene again to stabilize the economy.

''If there needs to be further action, we'll take it, in a way that does not damage the long-term financial health of our economy,'' Bush said.

It was the second signal in two days from Bush about the possibility of more government action to help hurting consumers and a shaken financial market. Much of his agenda these days is meant to show he is engaged in fixing the economy but still confident in it.

Bush was not specific about other steps he might take.

The latest Fed move brought the federal funds rate - the interest that banks charge one another - down to 2.25 percent, the lowest since late 2004.

That's important far beyond bank boardrooms. The reduction triggered announcements from commercial banks that they were cutting their prime lending rate to 5.25 percent from 6 percent. This rate is the benchmark for millions of business and consumer loans.

The Fed action was designed to lower borrowing costs and boost spending by consumers and businesses and thus increase economic activity. Economic growth slowed to a near standstill in the final three months of last year as the nation was hit by a series of blows including the credit crunch, a prolonged housing slump, rising unemployment and surging energy prices.

The Federal Reserve has now cut its funds rate by three-fourths of a percentage point twice this year. The first occurred on Jan. 22 after an emergency meeting and was followed by a half-point cut at a regular meeting on Jan. 30. The three rate cuts over the course of two months represent the most aggressive Fed credit easing since mid-1982 when the Paul Volcker-led Fed was working to get the country out of a deep recession.

The Fed also announced that it was reducing its discount rate, the interest it charges to make direct loans to banks, by a similar three-quarters of a point, pushing this rate down to 2.5 percent.

That cut, which followed a quarter-point reduction in the discount rate on Sunday, was seen as a clear signal that the Fed is ready to supply significant amounts of credit in direct loans to banks and other institutions through its discount window in an effort to stabilize financial markets roiled by the collapse over the weekend of Bear Stearns, the nation's fifth largest investment bank.

''We had been on the brink of the biggest financial meltdown this country had ever seen, but I think the Fed has now turned the psychology around,'' said David Jones, chief economist at DMJ Advisors. ''The Fed is saying it is ready to supply all the emergency credit banks need to get us out of this crisis.''


UTAH'S GROWTH IN JOBS COOLING
(Source: Lesley Mitchell, Salt Lake Tribune, 3/18/08)

Two reports show that plummeting home sales have begun to affect Utah's economy in a big way.

The Utah Department of Workforce Services said that job growth in the state in the year that ended Feb. 29 slipped to 2.3 percent. That's down from a revised 2.6 percent job growth in the year that ended Jan. 31 and from a peak of 5.4 percent in the year that ended June 30, 2006.

Putting those percentages into hard numbers, Utah created about 28,100 new jobs in the Utah economy during the year that ended in February, much fewer than the 54,000 jobs during the year that ended June 2006.

Buoyed by commercial construction and other industries, Utah's job growth is still positive, of course, and well above the national average of 0.6 percent. But in recent months employment growth in the state has lost more and more steam, prompted in great part by job losses related to residential real estate. As home sales have plummeted, people working for home builders, and mortgage and title companies, as well as real estate agents, have lost jobs in recent months.

State officials say Utah's job growth isn't likely to dip below zero, which would mean the state's economy is losing jobs overall. But it can get close.

"The question now is, how far until it hits bottom?" asked economist Mark Knold, of the Utah Department of Workforce Services.

Utah's unemployment rate for February moved up slightly to 3 percent, meaning about 41,000 Utahns were out of work last month. The U.S. unemployment rate was 4.8 percent. The state's real estate downturn is especially apparent in data from Construction Monitor for February.

Builders along the Wasatch Front took out permits for the construction of only 261 homes last month, the lowest level since at least 1990 and down nearly 72 percent from 928 units in February 2007, according to the service, which tracks building activity throughout the West.

February's total also is lower than any other February since at least 1990, when the service began compiling permit data.

Nationally, building permits plunged by 7.8 percent in February to an annual rate of 978,000 units, the slowest pace in 16 years.

Knold believes the situation in Utah isn't going to turn itself around this spring, as some have hoped.

He said the market won't start to show increased demand for homes until sellers - home builders and homeowners alike - start lowering prices on properties they hope to sell. That has started to happen, but not to the extent some economists say is warranted.

The good news for the state's job outlook, however, is the relative strength of commercial construction. Construction employment in Utah overall is down 1.3 percent for the year that ended in February. The drop could have been much deeper if the state's commercial construction industry wasn't still healthy. The only other sector to report fewer overall jobs is the information sector, which includes jobs at publishing, motion picture, telecommunication and Internet service companies. But much of that industry's 2.6 percent decline can be attributed to a change in the way those jobs are accounted rather than real job losses.

Alan Rindlisbacher, director of corporate marketing for the commercial construction company The Layton Cos. in Sandy, said commercial construction isn't as robust as it was two years ago. But it's still strong, he said, which makes it possible for some employees who have lost jobs in residential construction to find jobs in commercial construction.

In addition, thousands of people will work in the coming years on various aspects of City Creek Center, a project in downtown Salt Lake City being undertaken by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. "With projects like City Creek, everyone in commercial construction is going to continue to be busy for the next several years," Rindlisbacher said.

--- The Associated Press contributed to this report.

 



CALENDAR

Return to Top of Page

2008

new web bluebar.JPG - 1.70 K
APRIL new web bluebar.JPG - 1.70 K

10-11  Climate Change and the Natural Resources Industry, Phoenix, AZ. For more info. visit www.rmmlf.org

30-1    RMCMI Colorado-Utah meeting, Grand Junction, CO. For more info. visit www.rmcmi.org

new web bluebar.JPG - 1.70 K
MAY new web bluebar.JPG - 1.70 K

8-9   Counting The Cost of Climate Change: Policies and Carbon Issues Conference. Little America, Salt Lake City. For more info. contact Maegan Peck at mpeck@energystrat.com

new web bluebar.JPG - 1.70 K
JUNE new web bluebar.JPG - 1.70 K

1-5   International Technical Conference on Coal Utilization & Fuel Systems, Sheraton Sand Key, Clear water, Florida. For more info. visit www.coaltechnologies.com

10     UMA Educational Golf Touranment, Riverbend Golf Course, Riverton, Utah

14-19  American Society of Mining & Reclamation, Richmond Marriott, Richmond, VA. For more info. visit http://www.cses.vt.edu/revegetation/ASMR_2008.html

17-18 Safety First: Be part of the solution to prevent substance abuse in the mines. University of Utah Campus, Salt Lake City, Utah. Details regarding registration fee and lodging will be available early in 2008. See website: uuhsc.utah.edu/uas

26-27   Misuse and Abuse of Alcohol and Other Drugs in the Mining Industry, University of Utah Campus, Salt Lake City, Utah. For additional information and registration application check the School's website: http://uuhsc.utah.edu/uas or email slangston@utah.gov or dana.hughes@hsc.utah.edu

29-1 RMCMI Convention, The Canyons, Park City, Utah. For more info. visit www.rmcmi.org

new web bluebar.JPG - 1.70 K
AUGUST new web bluebar.JPG - 1.70 K

14-15  UMA 93RD ANNUAL CONVENTION, GRAND SUMMIT HOTEL, PARK CITY, UTAH

 

 


Return to Top of Page      Return to Home Page